Issue 240618.2: DW_AT_rnglists_base missing
Author: | David Anderson |
---|---|
Champion: | |
Date submitted: | 2024-06-18 |
Date revised: | 2024-09-24 |
Date closed: | |
Type: | Clarification |
Status: | Open |
DWARF Version: | 6 |
BACKGROUND
References are to DWARF5 unless otherwise indicated.
If a split-full CU uses DW_FORM_rnglistx
,
is a DW_AT_rnglists_base
required?
Apparently not, since in cases I have seen in object files
with a single rnglist in .debug_rnglists.dwo
there is no DW_AT_rnglists_base
.
The operative assumption seems to be that consumers will simply
assume zero as the (missing) DW_AT_rnglists_base
.
Seen in llvm and gcc.
The intent of this proposal is to get clarity.
An alternative version could state:
If a Split Full Compilation Unit refers to
.debug_rnglists.dwo
withDW_FORM_rnglistx
the CU DIE must have aDW_AT_rnglists_base
attribute.
PROPOSAL
At the end Sec F.1 Overview just before Table F.1:
If a Split Full Compilation Unit refers to
.debug_rnglists.dwo
withDW_FORM_rnglistx
and the correctDW_AT_rnglists_base
would be zero, theDW_AT_rnglists_base
may be omitted.