Issue 100517.1: Implicit location descriptions not mentioned in DW_OP_bit_piece description

Author:	Jakub Jelinek
Champion:
Date submitted:	2010-05-17
Date revised:
Date closed:
Type:	Clarification
Status:	Accepted
DWARF Version:	4

Section 2.6.1.2, pg 29

The DW_OP_bit_piece description talks about the meaning of offset for empty 
location descriptions, register location descriptions and memory addresses, but don't 
talk about its meaning for implicit location descriptions (DW_OP_stack_value and 
DW_OP_bit_piece).  

I'd say they should be handled like register location descriptions, i.e. offset 
should be from the least significant bit of the value on the top of the stack.