Issue 130530.1: Type Hash editorial change

Author: Eric Christopher
Champion: Eric Christopher
Date submitted: 2013-05-30
Date revised:
Date closed:
Type: Editorial
Status: Accepted
DWARF Version: 5
 
Section 7, pg 188
In order to be more specific with respect to endianness etc how about we use 
"least significant" rather than "lower" for the MD5 hash.

Change:

Once the string S has been formed from the DWARF encoding, an MD5 hash is computed for 
the string and the lower 64 bits are taken as the type signature

To Read:

Once the string S has been formed from the DWARF encoding, an MD5 hash is computed for 
the string and the least significant 64 bits are taken as the type signature

---
Accepted: 10/23/2013.